Sprite Lightning
Here you will find a pertinent collection of articles about a topic that is
very interesting to me. Sprites Lightning.

Space Shuttle Observations of Lightning - Mesoscale Lightning Experiment

Background
The present Shuttle lightning observation research program evolved from
cooperative research efforts of the Marshall Space Flight Center, State
University of New York at Albany, and New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Technology at Socorro. These cooperative research programs were conducted to
learn more about atmospheric electricity and it's relationship to severe storms
and their development. These programs, during the late 1970's and early 1980's,
used the NASA Ames U-2
high altitude research aircraft to over-fly developing thunderstorms and or
mesoscale thunderstorm complexes. An instrumented pallet, located in the bottom
of the U-2 aircraft, provided both optical
and electrical signatures from the lightning that were being observed during
the over-flights. A CCD TV line-scan camera with a diffraction grating filter
provided crude spectral information.
In addition, research flights around thunderstorms were conducted in 1979
using a general aviation aircraft, an instrumented
Bellanca Viking , provided by Airborne Research Associates of Weston, Mass.
This aircraft, under contract to NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, was used as
a test bed to to provide data of the design of a lightweight lightning detection
and photographic system that was later flown on the NASA Space Shuttles STS-2,
STS-4, and STS-6. This
experimental hardware was called Night-time and Daytime Optical Survey of
Lightning Experiment (NOSL) and a number of interesting movie sequences were
obtained of lightning as seen from the orbiting Shuttle. After this series of
Shuttle flights we began to use the payload bay low light level cameras whenever
the crewmembers were not using them as part of their normal operations and again
some interesting lightning video was collected.
During the late 1980's, after the Space Shuttle Challenger STS-51L disaster
(Jan. 28, 1986), a new approach to observe lightning was proposed. This program
continued the lightning research program of previous Space Shuttle flights and
it was called Mesoscale Lightning Experiment (MLE). The purpose was to observe
lightning that was directly under the shuttle as it would be seen by an unmanned
orbiting satellite. The data obtained from a number of these Shuttle flights has
provided design criteria data that has been incorporated in the design of future
sensors for lightning detection and location satellites to be flown in the late
1990's.

Current Efforts
In late 1988 a revised operations plan for MLE was initiated which would use
the low light
level TV cameras located in the Shuttle' payload bay in a different
operational mode. The TV cameras would be operated by the Instrumentation and
Communication Operations (INCO'S) personnel located in the Mission Control
Center on the ground rather that have the crew to conduct the TV cameras to
observe lightning storms that maybe near the limb of the earth. This observation
program relieves the crew of the camera operations and allows more observation
time to see the large mesoscale storms and their lightning displays. Since the
location of the Shuttle is known from it's orbit and due to the low light level
sensitivity of the payload bay TV cameras, the star fields and the airglow of
the earth can be observed and it is possible to determine the size of the
lightning flashes as they are seen. John McKune of NASA Johnson Space Flight
Center developed a computer program which he uses in Shuttle pointing operations
and it has been used to help us here at MSFC to locating the storm complexes. It
also allows one to determine the size of the flashes that are seen in the video
images.
During a Shuttle mission STS-34 on October 21, 1989 (Orbit 44) we saw a
phenomena that we had not seen before. Although commercial aviation and military
pilots had reported that they had seen lightning proceed out the top of
thunderstorms and move upward toward the ionosphere,there were no photographic
data to prove that this type event had occured. In a number of cases the pilots
who saw this type of phenomena and reported it were told that maybe it could
happen by the meteorologists who were on duty at the time. Some of these
observations were reported in the literature.
During the STS-34 mission, which occured on the night of October 21, 1989,
we observed and recorded, using the shuttle's low light level TV cameras, our
first vertical like discharge moving out from the top of a thunderstorm that was
being illuminated by intra-cloud lightning.
To date our Shuttle observations have captured a total of 19 of the upward
vertical like discharges.

Analysis Techniques
Specialized video evaluation software,in conjunction with a Silicon Graphics
Iris Indigo Computer, is now being used to digitize the video images for
analysis. This equipment allows the researcher to determine the flash rate of
the lightning, the size of the flashes, as well as the size of the thunderstorm
complexes that are being analyzed.
The analysis capabilities are to be improved in the future as better image
enhancement tools become available, state-of-the-art frame grabbers, and/or
other software tools become available. We are also planning for the use of
CAD/CAM equipment and additional software to provide better mapping tools to
display and locate the storm cells with better precision.

Images and Movie Loops
Images
-
-
Image and schematic from STS-43, Orbit 55
-
Montages of other vertical lightning discharges into the stratosphere
-
These montages contain video images captured by the low light level TV
from various space shuttle missions. Time stamps are of the format:
Month Day Year HH:MM:SS.milliseconds Mission/Orbit number , where
the time is Universal time (UTC).
MPEG movies
Mpeg movie production courtesy of the Engineering Photo Analysis Group of
the MSFC propulsion laboratory.
-
-
STS-58 Columbia, with moonlight. This mesoscale convective complex
is approximately 930 km across the field of view.
-
-
STS-48, Discovery, low illumination moonlight provides minimal
background. Clouds are not seen under this illumination, but the lightning
flashes are easily seen. The coast of France is on the left side of the
image, and the city of Algiers appears later in the imagery. The average
size of the lightning cells is about 35 km and the estimated flash rate
for one cell in this system was about 130 flashes per minute.
-
-
Most of the small flashes seen in this movie are approximately 35
km in diameter.
Stay Tuned ... More to come.

Ground Based Observations of Atmospheric Flashes
Ground based observations by Franz, Nemzek and Winkler reported in Science
magazine (1990) that they had observed large luminous discharges above a
thunderstorm using a low-light level black and white TV camera system. At 22:14
CST on July 6, 1989 they recorded a twin
flash originating in a storm top cloud and discharging into the
stratosphere. The active thunderstorm was about 250 km from their site, and
below the horizon, so only the upper discharge-like events can be seen.
During the period from 1992 and 1994 Winckler and his associates reported
that 150 large discharges were seen over storms in Iowa during 9-10 August 1993.
Ground based research of Lyons and his associates in 1993 reported that he
had recorded from his site in Fort Collins Colorado using low-light level black
and white TV cameras well in excess of 600 cloud to stratosphere
events (CS).
During the period of 1994 Lyons continued his investigations, and on July
11-12 over 40 large sprites were associated with intense cloud flashes.
Images in this section were created from video tapes which were provided
by Winkler and Lyons

Recent developments in the study of Atmospheric "Flashes"
Data in this section were developed from a video tape provided by Dave
Sentman of the Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Color image of
a Red Sprite on July 4, 1994 at 04:00:20 UTC, which reached an altitude of
over 85 km, the tendrils beneath the sprite are as low as 60 km. The bright area
beneath the sprite is an over-exposure of normal lightning occuring in the top
portion of an active thunderstorm complex located in the Texas panhandle. Cloud
tops in this complex were about 18 km.
Note the similarities between Sentmans black
and white image of a red sprite taken July 4, 1994 at 04:14:19 UTC and this Shuttle-based
black and white image observed September 15, 1993 at 01:18:14 UTC. The
shuttle was about 1850 km from the target. The shuttle-observed feature appears
to have come from a thunderstorm over the edge of the earth's limb. The
above-limb portion of this event is approximately 47 km in length. The image
that Sentman captured was taken from an aircraft position much closer to the
storm complex.
Black and White images of Blue Jets taken by a very wide angle low-light TV
camera flying near an active thunderstorm, in eastern Arkansas on July 1 1994.
MPEG movie sequence of Blue Jets, corresponding to the above still frames.
 |
|

Observations of Sprites and Jets from Langmuir Laboratory, New Mexico*
Mark Stanley, Paul Krehbiel, William Rison, Charles Moore, Marx Brook
Geophysical Research Center, New Mexico Tech., Socorro, NM 87801
and
O.H. Vaughan
Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA, Huntsville, AL 35812
A low light level video camera was used to observe thunderstorms at night
during the summer of 1996. The Langmuir Laboratory is situated at 3200 m.
elevation in central New Mexico.
Spectacular video observations were obtained of sprites and upward jet
phenomenon at relatively close range (75-150 km.) above a large storm over
Ruidoso and Carrizozo, New Mexico on the night of July 24/25, 1996. The jets
were upward branched from a single vertical channel and had spectacular
"fountain" and "flame" or "flare" shapes. The
upward development was often detected in sequential video fields, but the flame
or flare jets typically appeared in only a single 16 ms field. The inferred
development /propagation speed of the latter events was on the order of 10^6
m/s. The flame events exhibited a dense, fine dendritic structure, while the
flares and fountains had a smaller number of upward branches, with residual
"hot spots" as in subsequent fields. Several higher altitude sprites
appeared to be observed at close range and high elevation angle (45 degrees) by
the camera.
A black and white movie of very close images of what is probably a Blue Jet
taken by a low-light TV camera , during the Langmuir observations. (Sequence not
in real time.)
*Results of this research were presented at the December 1996 meeting in San
Francisco, CA.

Recent Reports On Shuttle Lightning Research
Wescott, E.M., Sentman, D.D., Heavner, M.J., Hampton, D.L., Osborne, D.L.,
and O.H. Vaughan Jr., 1996, "Blue starters: Brief Upward discharges from
an intense Arkansas thunderstorm," Geophysical Research Letters,
Vol. 23, No. 16, pp. 2153-2156, August 1, 1996.
Vaughan, Otha H. Jr., 1994, "NASA Shuttle Lightning Research:
Observations of Nocturnal Thunderstorms and Lightning Displays as Seen During
Recent Space Shuttle Missions," Conference on Optical Spectroscopic
Techniques and Instrumentation for Atmospheric and Space Research, SPIE
- The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 2266, 25-27 July
1994, San Diego, California.
Boeck, William, Otha H. Vaughan, Jr, Richard Blakeslee, Bernard Vonnegut,
Marx Brook, and John McKune, Jr, 1995, "Observations of Lightning in the
Stratosphere", Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 100,
No. D1, pp. 1465-1475, January 20, 1995.
Vaughan, Otha H. Jr., 1994, "Observations of Nocturnal Thunderstorms
and Lightning Displays as Seen During Recent Shuttle Missions," Fifth
Symposium on Global Change, and the Symposium on Global Electric Circuit,
Global Change, and the Meteorological Applications of Lightning Information,
American Meteorological Society, Jan. 23-28, Nashville, TN., pp. 355-359.
Vaughan, Otha H. Jr., Richard Blakeslee, William Boeck, Bernard Vonnegut,
Marx Brook, and John. McKune Jr., 1992, "A Cloud-to-Space Lightning as
Recorded by the Space Shuttle Payload-Bay TV Cameras," Monthly
Weather Review, 120 (7), pp. 1459-1461.
Vaughan, Otha H. Jr., 1990, "Mesoscale Lightning Experiment (MLE): A
View as Seen from Space During the STS-26 Mission," NASA TM-103513.

Principal Investigator Mesoscale Lightning Experiment (MLE)
Otha H.
Vaughan, Jr.
Earth System Science Division
Space Sciences Lab, NASA/MSFC
Huntsville, AL 35812
Email: skeet.vaughan@msfc.nasa.gov
Phone: (205) 922-5893
Another great SOURCE
for information about Sprite Lightning.
|
|
|

|

|

|
Scientists Seek Sprite Light Source
|
06.07.05
|
Giant red blobs, picket fences, upward branching carrots, and
tentacled octopi -- these are just a few of the phrases used to
describe sprites -- spectacular, eerie flashes of colored light
high above the tops of powerful thunderstorms that can travel up
to 50 miles high in the atmosphere.
Image to right: This
dramatic, garishly colored image was captured with a low-light
level camera on June 7, 2001. It shows what appears to be a
"burning tree", or red sprite, above the National Cheng
Kung University campus in Tainan City, Taiwan. Click on image
to enlarge. Credit: ISUAL Project, NCKU/NSPO, Taiwan
Most researchers have long supported the theory that sprites are
linked to major lightning charges. Still, some scientists believe
that conditions high in the atmosphere, like meteoritic dust
particles or gravity waves might also induce sprite formation.
Now, a study led by Steven Cummer of Duke University, Durham, N.C.
and Walter Lyons of FMA Research, Inc., Fort Collins, Colo. has
found more evidence that sprites are generated by major lightning
strikes. They also found the total charge, as it moves from the
cloud to the ground, and multiplied by that distance, known as the
"lightning charge moment," is most critical in the
sprite's development. The study appeared in the April 2005 issue
of Journal of Geophysical Research--Space Physics.
During the summer of 2000, researchers from across the nation
participated in the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and
Precipitation Study. While the primary goal was to study severe
thunderstorms and their link to heavy rain and hail, scientists
also gathered important data on lightning's role in triggering
events above thunderclouds, like sprites.

Images above: Sprites
over thunderstorms in Kansas on August 10, 2000, observed in the
mesosphere, with an altitude of 50-90 kilometers as a response to
powerful lightning discharges from tropospheric thunderstorms. The
true color of sprites is pink-red. Click on images to enlarge.
Credit: Walter Lyons, FMA Research, Fort Collins, Colorado
Armed with the aid of sophisticated instruments and sensors,
Cummer collected information from three thunderstorm outbreaks
across the central U.S. and compared the "lightning charge
moment" in both sprite and non-sprite producing lightning.
"The idea was that if other factors contributed to lowering
the electric field threshold for sprite initiation, they would
probably not always be present and we would find that sprites
occasionally form after just modest lightning strokes," said
Cummer.
Simulations created with the help of NASA computer animations and
other data showed that weak lightning strikes do not create
sprites. They also found factors other than the cloud-to-ground
charge transfer are generally not important ingredients in sprite
development.
Sprites, not formally identified until 1989 when the Space Shuttle
(STS-34) recorded flashes as it passed over a thunderstorm in
northern Australia, are largely unpredictable and brief, lasting
only 3 to 10 milliseconds and inherently difficult to study. But,
the technique used in this study also proved that "a single
sensor can monitor moment change in lightning strikes over a very
large area, providing a reasonable way of estimating how often
sprites occur globally," said Cummer. Much research to date
has instead relied on the strategic placement of multiple low
light video cameras.
Lightning's other cousins, including elves that bring a
millisecond flash of light that fills the entire night sky within
a 100 kilometer (62 mile) radius of the associated lightning
strike, are generating much interest because of their strong
electric fields and electromagnetic pulses that may interact with
the Earth's ionosphere and magnetosphere.
Related websites:
+
FMA's Sprite and Lightning Research
+
FMA's Sprite Trivia
+
National Weather Service, Pueblo, Colorado, Lightning Resource
Page
+
National Weather Service: Red Sprites and Blue Jets
|
|
Sprites and Jets

Click on the thumbnail below to view a photo of a red sprite. The photo is
just one frame from a ground-breaking video taken of a phenomenon that
continues to intrigue scientists. The full-sized photo can be viewed in color
by using JPEG.
SPRITE OBSERVATIONS REPORTING
If you have observed a sprite or any
other optical emissions above a thunderstorm, please report it using this
form .

Developments in the Study of Atmospheric "Flashes"
Slide #1. Black and White Image of Red Sprite
This large red sprite was observed over a thunderstorm in the Midwest; the top
of the sprite is higher than 280,000 feet (85 km); the tendrils beneath the
sprite are as low as 195,000 feet (60 km). The bright area beneath the sprite
is an overexposure of normal lightning occurring at the thunderstorm's cloud
top which is 55,000 feet high. This image was captured on the night of July 3,
at 11:00 PM Central Daylight Time (CDT), using a low-light-level color
television camera from an airplane flying at 43,000 feet. Universal Time (UT)
is shown at the bottom of the image; 04:00:02:00 UT (on July 4 UT date) equals
11:00:02 CDT. Image credit: Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska
Fairbanks.
Slide #2. Group of Sprites (with Altitude Marked)
A family of sprites captured over the Midwest on July 6 at 12:29 AM CDT (05:29
UT) using a very wide angle low-light-level, black- and-white television
camera. By using triangulation of the images of the same sprites taken from
the two aircraft, an accurate determination of the height and size is made.
The thunderstorm's cloud top is at an altitude of about 42,000 feet and the
highest parts of the sprites are at an altitude of 59 miles (95 kilometers).
In this image Universal Time is shown in the upper left; other flight data is
shown at the bottom. Image credit: Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska
Fairbanks.
Slide #3 Black and White Image of a Blue Jet
This large blue jet, shooting upwards from a thunderstorm's top, reached an
upper altitude of about 130,000 feet (40 km). These jets have been reported in
anecdotal accounts over the last century. This image and other images of jets
captured on the evening of June 30 are the first ever recorded. The jets
appear to move at speeds of 45,000 to 223,000 miles per hour (20 to 100 km per
sec). This example was captured with a very wide angle low-light,
black-and-white television camera flying over eastern Arkansas at 10:03 PM CDT
(03:03 UT on UT date July 1). Universal Time is shown in the upper left; other
flight data is shown at the bottom. Image credit: Geophysical Institute,
University of Alaska Fairbanks.

The University of Alaska
To understand more about sprites, how to look for them, current research,
and more, click here.

Marshall Space Flight Center
There are some very interesting pictures and accounts of sprites and jets
on this page about Shuttle
Lightning Observation.


Responsible Webpage Official: George Withbroe
NASA Headquarters, Code S
George.Withbroe@hq.nasa.gov
(202) 358-2150
Web Editor: Amy
Skowronek
(301) 286-4713
Last Modified: 1997 December 03
|
|
Three bolts from the blue
Fundamental questions about atmospheric
electricity
|
One of a series of stories covering the quadrennial
International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, June
7-11, 1999, in Guntersville, Ala.
|
June 8, 1999: Does lightning affect the ozone layer? What
causes "sprites?" And why does "messy" lightning
follow a simple lightning model?
Martin Uman of the University of Florida asked these questions
yesterday at the opening of the International Conference for
Atmospheric Electricity. While most of the scientists will share what
they have learned in their specific areas of study, Uman instead
decided to ask a few general questions about atmospheric electricity.
Uman hopes to motivate discussion among all the conference scientists
so they will work together to solve these atmospheric mysteries.
"I'm asking these questions because nobody ever worries about
putting it all together," Uman said.
|
Uman's first question was: How much
nitric oxide (NO) is produced by atmospheric electric discharges? It
is important to study nitric oxide levels because of its impact on the
ozone layer in the troposphere
and stratosphere.
This ozone layer protects us from harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation,
but nitric oxide can destroy ozone.

Left:
The ozone hole at the Earth's South Pole. The TOMS (Total Ozone
Mapping Spectrometer) false-color image shows low levels of ozone in
blue, high levels in red. This time-elapsed image shows the ozone hole
as it develops each year between late August and early October.
Increasing concentrations of nitric oxide and other chemicals in
the Earth's atmosphere contribute to the ozone hole over Antarctica.
Although most of this nitric oxide is produced by human activity,
lightning also produces a small but significant amount. Still,
estimates vary about exactly how much nitric oxide is produced by
lightning.
"The literature about NO production is confusing," said
Uman. "Everyone cites different production levels, so it's still
an unsolved mystery."
Right:
Moonrise over the Earth's atmosphere. This fragile-looking shell
protects us from powerful radiation coming from space.
Also, scientists don't really know what sort of electrical
discharges produce nitric oxide. Although it is well established that
lightning produces some nitric oxide, other electrical discharges such
as sprites could also be a source.
|
Uman then asked about sprites - huge colored emissions coming from
the tops of thunderclouds. Once thought to be extremely rare,
high-altitude cameras have shown us that sprites are often produced by
thunderstorms. While the upper portions of sprites are red, they also
have wispy blue tendrils that extend downward.
According to current models, only the most powerful lightning
strikes generate enough energy to produce sprites. Uman questioned
whether these models are accurate representations of the energy needed
to genera te
sprites.
"The models don't agree with the all the measurements, so
there's a big debate over which is wrong," said Uman. "Are
the models wrong, or do we need to get better measurements?"
Left: A red sprite photographed by
a team at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Sprites are emitted
near the tops of thunderclouds and reach up into the ionosphere.
"The transmission line model is a case of a model that works,
but probably shouldn't," Uman said.
|
The transmission line model for lightning shows a smooth upward
curve of current. Lightning, however, is not a smooth and steady
phenomena.
"Lightning is a mess," said Uman. "The transmission
line model is the oldest and simplest model about lightning, so it
shouldn't work. Lightning is much more complicated than that."
Lightning does not follow a simple path across the sky. For
instance, downward
lightning can meet upward lighting in the middle of a cloud. Despite
the 'messiness' of lightning, it somehow still obeys the simple
current curve of the transmission line model.
Right:
Lightning often exhibits complex patterns in the sky. Credit:
Australian Severe Weather/ Michael Bath.
Uman asked these questions because he believes most theorists are too
intent on developing their own models. By posing these questions at
the International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, Uman hopes to
stimulate further thought about the physics of lightning. When these
questions are answered, they could fundamentally alter our
understanding of how electricity interacts with the atmosphere.
|
Web Links
|
Human
Voltage (June 18, 1999) Scientists discuss biology, safety, and
statistics of lightning strikes.
News shorts from Atmospheric Electricity Conference (June 16,
1999) Poster papers on hurricanes and tornadoes summarized.
Soaking in atmospheric electricity (June 15, 1999) 'Fair weather'
measurements important to understanding thunderstorms.
Lightning
position in storm may circle strongest updrafts (June 11, 1999)
New finding could help in predicting hail, tornadoes
Lightning follows the Sun (June 10, 1999) Space imaging team
discovers unexpected preferences
Spirits of another sort (June 10, 1999) Thunderstorms generate
elusive and mysterious sprites.
Getting
a solid view of lightning (June 9, 1999): New Mexico team develops
system to depict lightning in three dimensions.
Learning
how to diagnose bad flying weather (June 8, 1999): Scientists
discuss what they know about lightning's effects on spacecraft and
aircraft.
Three bolts from the blue (June 8, 1999): Fundamental questions
about atmospheric electricity posed at conference this week.
Lightning
Leaders Converge in Alabama (May 24, 1999): Preview of the 11th
International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity.
What
Comes Out of the Top of a Thunderstorm? (May 26, 1999): Gamma-rays
(sometimes).
Lightning research
at NASA/Marshall and the Global Hydrology and Climate Center.
|
THE ROLE OF THE SPACE SHUTTLE VIDEOTAPES IN
THE DISCOVERY OF SPRITES, JETS AND ELVES
William L. Boeck
Niagara University, New York
Otha H. Vaughan, Jr. and Richard J.
Blakeslee
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center,
Huntsville, Alabama
Bernard Vonnegut
State University of New York at Albany,
Albany, New York
Marx Brook
New Mexico Institute of Mining &
Technology, Socorro, New Mexico
Abstract.
The sequence of video tape observations of the upper atmospheric optical
flashes called sprites, jets, starters, and ELVES are described in the
successsive phases of search, discovery, confirmation, and exploration for the
years before 1993. Although there were credible eyewitness accounts from
ground observers and pilots, these reports did not inspire a systematic search
for hard evidence of such phenomena. The science community would instead wait
for serendipitous observations to move the leading edge of this science
forward. The phenomenon, now known as a sprite, was first accidently
documented on ground based videotape recordings on the night of July 6, 1989.
Video observations from the space shuttle acquired from 1989 through 1991
provided 17 additional examples to confirm the existence of the sprites
phenomenon. Successful video observations from a mountain ridge by Lyons, starting
July 7, 1993, and night-time aircraft video observations by Sentman and
Wescott on July 8, 1993 established the basic science of the sprite phenomena
by acquiring and analyzing data based on hundreds of new events. The 1994
Sprites campaign and the video titled "Red Sprites and Blue Jets"
popularized the name sprite and provided a vocabulary of terms to describe the
visual attributes. Prior to this video, investigators used a variety of vague
descriptive words to describe the individual events. Also, during the 1994
campaign, Wescott and coworkers obtained the first quantative measurements of
jets and provided the name "blue jets". A third phenomenon was
discovered in video from the STS-41 mission (October 1990) in the lower
ionosphere directly above an active thunderstorm. It consisted of a large
horizontal brightening several hundred kilometers across at the altitude of
the airglow layer. In 1995, Lyons and associates confirmed the existence of
this type of very brief brightening which they named Emissions of Light and
Very Low Frequency Perturbations From Electromagnetic Pulse Sources (ELVES).
Because sprites, jets, and ELVES have appeared for millennia, their discovery
was inevitable. The partial history related in this paper outlines the
unsophisticated activities using shuttle video and the dissemination of the
results by video presentations during the early phases of sprite research.
This paper does not attempt to evaluate the advances in the science based on
the measurement campaigns of Lyons, Sentman and the many other investigators.
Background
The observation of lightning is one of the
oldest human activities on this planet. Yet, it is surprising that a category
of lightning phenomena, that are visible to the unaided eye, were not more
thoroughly investigated before 1989. Perhaps this stems primarily from the
fact that the point-of-view for most observations, explanations, and theories
about lightning has been from the vantage point of an earth-bound observer.
When the lightning phenomena were viewed from a different vantage point - from
above the thunderstorms (e.g., from space, aircraft or mountaintop) - new
discoveries were made and insights gained into the upper atmospheric optical
flashes now commonly referred to as sprites, jets, starters, and ELVES.
The lightning research summarized in this
paper is a modern example of "pure science". These are serendipitous
observations of natural events obtained by scientists who were unwilling to
dismiss the unknown and the undiscovered as unimportant or random. The phases
of an advance in science are comparable to the discovery of a new route over a
mountain range. Rumors or stories of new trail motivate the search phase. Then
someone with a combination of good luck and effort discovers a crossing. The
initial discovery is followed by a trailblazer that confirms the discovery and
leaves guidance for those who follow. Finally, exploration of the new trail
involves a focused construction campaign and "heavy equipment". This
paper reviews the initial investigations into sprites, jets, starters, and
ELVES. The sequence of events in obtaining video in the time period before
1993 will be described as the phases of search, discovery, confirmation, and
exploration.
Search Phase for Sprites and Jets
Throughout the historical scientific
literature, there are sprinklings of eyewitness accounts of unusual
"lightning" observed in the clear air above nighttime thunderstorms.
The descriptions use phases such as "continuous darts of light...
ascended to a considerable altitude, resembling rockets more than
lightning." (MacKenzie and Toynbee, 1886), "a luminous trail
shot up to 15 degrees or so, about as fast as, or faster than, a rocket"
(Everett, 1903), "a long weak streamer of a reddish hue" (Malan,
1937), "flames appearing to rise from the top of the cloud" (Ashmore,
1950), or "the discharge assumed a shape similar to roots of a tree in an
inverted position" (Wood, 1951). Partly because these eyewitness
reports of unusual "lightning" appearing above thunderstorms were
never captured on film, the lightning science community generally ignored
them. The lack of an established vocabulary and the existence of several
distinctive phenomena contributed to the variation in the verbal descriptions.
The number of reports increased as the view
point moved up from the ground, to aircraft, and up towards space. Throughout
his lifetime, Dr. Bernard Vonnegut maintained a keen interest in unusual
lightning produced by thunderstorms and tornadoes. He was the principal
investigator for the first space shuttle lightning observation experiment. He
collaborated with O. H. "Skeet" Vaughan, Jr., who used his
background as a researcher-pilot to gather information about pilot
observations. A number of the pilots were reluctant to officially report the
things they had seen, because the scientific community, the Air Force and the
airlines were skeptical of "upward lightning". In the 1980's,
Vaughan and Vonnegut (Vonnegut, 1980, Vaughan and Vonnegut,
1982; Gales, 1982; Vonnegut, 1984; Vaughan and Vonnegut,
1989) gathered and published reports of the unusual luminous phenomena that
pilots saw above thunderstorms. The pilots chose a variety of terms and
analogies to draw a verbal picture of "upward lightning". Although
these were credible eyewitnesses with a professional interest in severe
weather phenomena, their accounts did not inspire a general search for hard
evidence of such phenomena. The lightning science community would instead
depend on other serendipitous observations to move the leading edge of this
science forward.
Discovery of a Lighting Phenomenon Now
Known as a Sprite
The discovery of the phenomenon, now known
as a sprite, was first documented on video tape recorded the night of July 6,
1989. Dr. John Winckler and associates at the University of Minnesota were
conducting a cross calibration experiment of various optical sensors intended
for a sounding rocket flight. As part of this experiment, Dr. Robert Franz was
testing a low-light-level video camera by recording images of stars and a
distant lightning storm. Dr. Franz arrived after dark and set up the camera,
recorder and video monitor without lights. A few moments after he had found
and replaced a defective cable connector, the monitor displayed a twin flash
of light above the horizon. They immediately recognized that they had observed
something unusual and noteworthy. After a search of the literature and some
analysis, they concluded (Franz et al., 1990; Winckler et al.,
1995) that they recorded an "upward lightning flash" that probably
originated from a storm that was beyond the horizon. A daylight search of the
terrain in the direction of the flash did not reveal twin TV towers or any
other local explanation for the observation. Following publication of this
result, Dr. Winckler distributed video tapes to a few interested researchers.
The video tape contained both real time and slow motion images that accurately
convey those transient qualities of the phenomenon that are poorly conveyed by
a still picture and verbal description. In addition to documenting the reality
of upward lightning discharges that are now called sprites, the group also
demonstrated that image-intensified video cameras are required to capture the
sprite phenomena.
Confirmation of the Sprites Phenomena:
Observations from the Space Shuttle
Before the NASA space shuttle began to fly
in 1981, Vaughan and Vonnegut (1979) proposed to use the shuttle as an
observational platform to observe and photograph lightning. The main thrust of
the research was to develop an understanding of the role of lightning and how
it might relate to severe storm development as seen from space. The
Night-Time/Daytime Optical Survey of Lightning Experiment (NOSL) hardware was
flown on the space shuttle's STS-2, 4,and 6 missions (Vonnegut et al.,
1983, Vonnegut et al., 1985). Data from that experiment was the
catalyst for proposing a follow-on experiment called the Mesoscale Lighting
Experiment (MLE) that used the space shuttle's sensitive payload bay
monochrome video cameras to record the Earth's nighttime lightning activity
from space (Boeck, 1987). During the next few years the techniques for
obtaining and analyzing shuttle video imagery of lightning improved. Vaughan
and Blakeslee modified the operational plans for MLE to emphasize the use of
the payload bay cameras, rather than the astronaut hand held camcorder. They
planned to use the remotely controlled payload bay cameras on a
non-interference basis instead of requesting astronaut active participation,
because there is a 24-hour mission control crew on the ground. While the
shuttle crew members were sleeping, there were hours of opportunities for the
ground based Instrumentation and Communications personnel (INCO) at JSC to
make nighttime observations of storms. During the STS-30 (May 1989) and STS-34
(October 1989) missions, Vaughan and Blakeslee worked directly with the INCO
during the missions as the INCO remotely controlled the TV cameras to track
active thunderstorms.
In the spring of 1989, Vaughan found an
image of a streak of light in the MLE video from the space shuttle. It may
have been a sprite or it may have been video noise. In either case, the long
axis of this event aligned with a video scan line, and therefore the image was
indistinguishable from a product of random video noise. Vaughan continued to
search for an unambiguous event in the space shuttle video. Three shuttle
missions produced several hours of good data during the fall of 1989 and the
spring of 1990. Some anomalous events accompanying lightning were seen in the
video from the October 1989 STS-34 mission. In the summer of 1990, Dr. William
Boeck began a sabbatical leave at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC).
At that time, he and Vaughan worked on the analysis of the MLE data. During
the fall of 1990, the MLE data archives expanded further with the addition of
tens of hours of new lightning video. A copy of the Franz tape was also
available for study.
Vaughan, Boeck, and other researchers at MSFC studied each MLE video tape
using an editing VCR in 1990 and 1991. They watched hundreds of lightning
storms searching for interesting examples of lightning. Early in this process
they positively identified two or three "upward lightning" events
(i.e., sprites) in the stratosphere. The researchers found that when playing
the video tapes at normal playback speed, the sprites appeared and disappeared
before a solid mental impression was formed. However, if the observer slowly
played and replayed the video, the presence of a sprite image could be
confirmed. At the 1990 Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), Boeck
and Vaughan (1990) presented a video documenting the first sprite found in
shuttle data. The video format for the paper was chosen because information
about transient optical phenomena is more accurately conveyed by a videotape
replay rather than a description accompanied by a series of freeze frames. The
freeze frames are contaminated with video snow that the human vision system
can easily disregard during video playback.
In retrospect, researchers have determined that development
time is a defining characteristic for classifying the type of upper
atmospheric optical flashes. In the sprite video from Minnesota, as well as
the seventeen examples from space shuttle video acquired between October 1989
and November 1991 (Boeck and Vaughan, 1990; Boeck et al., 1991a,b;
Vaughan et al., 1992; Vaughan, 1993a,b; Vaughan, 1994a,b; Boeck
et al., 1995), the sprites appeared in a single video field without a
precursor at the sprite location. Researchers now know the characteristic
development time of a sprite is on the order of 10 milliseconds (ms). This
short duration fit the eyewitness descriptions of "flames" or
"darts of light".
These 17 examples established that the sequence of visible
events leading up to a sprite began with a discharge in the thundercloud.
After a typical delay of a quarter to a half-second there was a large increase
in both the horizontal extent and brightness in the cloud luminosity
accompanied by the appearance of the sprite. Later work (Boccippio et al.,
1994) has shown that these bright discharges are associated with large
amplitude return strokes bringing positive charge downward. In fact, a
positive return stroke accompanied the only MLE sprite recorded within range
of a ground based lightning detection network. The videos showed that
additional discharges continued in the clouds after a sprtie for a total mean
time of a second, which can be interpreted as evidence for a continuing
current. All together, this was strong evidence that the sprite above the
thunderstorm was caused, directly or indirectly, by an energetic lightning
discharge.
There were severe limitations in the use of shuttle video
camera recordings as scientific data. The monochrome shuttle video did not
provide any information on the optical spectrum of the sprites. Also, because
the range to the sprites was well over 1000 kilometers only the brightest
examples stood out from the video noise and the finer structure was poorly
resolved in the images. Because there was no readout of the zoom lens focal
length, only scenes with identified ground targets or star fields could be
calibrated for sprite size and geolocation. The most severe limitation was an
inability to track a storm for a time span of minutes to hours. This is
primarily due to the speed at which the shuttle passes over the earth
compounded by the fact that in INCO did not detect the presence of sprites
while controlling the camera. The later work of Lyons (Lyons and Williams,
1993) proved that sprite producing storms can be tracked for hours.
Analyses of the MLE videotapes (see this discussion in Boeck
et al., 1995, first draft of that paper submitted to JGR on 12/31/1992)
produced several general classes of events, including, blobs, columns and
filaments, and, distinction (e.g., single or multiple breaks) between the
upper and lower parts of the sprite. In effect they had identified many of the
larger features including the bright "head", weaker extensions (now
referred to as "tendrils") below the "head", and
occasional events showing weaker filaments above the main luminosity. Using
star fields and the shuttle orbital elements, it was possible to establish the
vertical and horizontal dimensions and stratospheric height (i.e., bright
"head" located at 60 to 75 km) for several of the events. The width
of the sprites varied considerably from very thin or even several thin
filaments to broad columns some kilometers across, while the bright
"head" (when visible) had dimensions on the order of kilometers.
Figure 1 is an example of a video image of a sprite from a thunderstorm that
is below the limb of the Earth, with a caption showing the vertical dimension
and position for this case. This sprite image is very similar to the sprite
images acquired from ground-based observations where the storm is often below
the visible horizon. Lyons (1993) received a complete set of the
unpublished shuttle videotapes that he used to obtain timing and other
associations in an independent analysis. Lyons
and Williams (1993) state that
"After intensive and repeated viewing of the Space Shuttle video imagery
and compilation of these statistics, one is left with the distinct impression
that there is a rather high degree of repeatability in many aspects of the CS
phenomena from event to event." (note, at this time sprites were called
CS events by Lyons and Williams.) Subsequent work has
confirmed and extended in great detail and with high resolution what was seen
in low resolution shuttle video. The early estimates of the relative frequency
of sprites were much too low. The large number of sprite images obtained in
the summer campaigns of 1993 and 1994 by ground based and airborne camera
established that the blobs, columns and filaments were in fact samples of the
wide natural variation in appearance of this phenomenon.
The 17 examples that were eventually cataloged demonstrated
that the occurrence of sprites is a global phenomenon, which occurs over land
and sea (Boeck et al., 1995). The MLE videotapes provide the only
evidence to date of sprite events in Australia, Africa and the south Pacific.
Exploration of Sprite Phenomena
The video confirmation of the existence and
general appearance of sprites caught the attention of many investigators. The
video was shown and distributed to audiences at the 1991 spring AGU meeting,
the 1991 International Aerospace Lightning Conference, the February 1991 69th
USAF and Navy Range Commander Council Meeting (Meteorology Group) and at
seminars at Los Alamos National Laboratory in October 1991 and Stanford
University in December of 1991. Copies of the videos were sent to NASA
Headquarters, TV and news media, individuals as well as Air Force and other
investigators.
Sentman and Wescott
(1993) begin their article with "An exciting recent finding in middle
atmospheric research is the confirmation that 'electrical discharges'
occasionally appear to extend upward from thunderstorm regions substantial
distances toward the ionosphere. Television observations from the ground (Franz
et al., 1990;Winckler et al., 1993) and from space shuttle (Boeck
et al., 1990; Vaughan et al., 1992; Boeck et al., 1993) of
what has been called 'cloud-stratosphere lightning' have confirmed the
existence of a previously reported (Boys, 1926; Malan, 1937; Vonnegut,
1980; Vaughan and Vonnegut, 1982; Vaughan and Vonnegut, 1989),
but apparently rare, form of atmospheric discharge." (NOTE Boeck et
al., 1993 in press was eventually published as Boeck et al., 1995)
Dr. Davis Sentman and Dr. Walter Lyons actively pursued NASA funding and
secured the level of support that allowed them to make detailed quantitative
measurements of sprite phenomena in 1993.
Successful observations from the ground (Lyons,
1993; Lyons and Williams, 1993) starting July 7, 1993 and
night-time aircraft observations (Sentman and Wescott, 1993; Sentman
et al, 1993; Wescott et al., 1993) on July 8, 1993 established and
rapidly matured the science of the sprite phenomena by acquiring and analyzing
data based on hundreds of new events. Lyons and Williams (1993) report
"These images almost certainly show the same phenomenon as observed by Franz
et al. (1990), in the Space Shuttle imagery and the 'plume' type discharge
described by Ashmore (1951), Wilson (1956), Fisher
(1990), Malan (1937) and others". On the night of July 6-7 Lyons
obtained 248 images, accompanied by NLDN data to demonstrate that this
phenomena was an order of magnitude more frequent than the previous estimate
based on shuttle observations. Sentman and Wescott (1993) state that
"We recently performed a series of aircraft flights using NASA's DC-8
Airborne Laboratory in an attempt to capture additional video images of these
discharges from a closer range than has been the case to date. In this letter
we report results of a preliminary analysis of video data showing unambiguous
optical signatures of numerous upper atmospheric optical flashes similar to
those reported by earlier investigators. We present new quantitative data on
their occurrence locations, physical dimensions, optical intensities and rates
of occurrence relative to tropospheric lightning."
During the years of 1990 through 1993,
authors used a number of different descriptive names for these flashes
including "large upward electrical discharge" (Franz et al.,
1990), "vertical light pulse" (Boeck et al. ,1991a,b),
"cloud-to-stratosphere electrical discharges" (Lyons, 1993a; Lyons
and Williams, 1993b; Lyons and Williams, 1994), "upper
atmospheric optical flashes" (Sentman and Wescott, 1993; Wescott
et al., 1993), "cloud to space lightning" (Vaughan et al.,
1992; Vaughan et al., 1993a,b), "stratospheric flash" (Boeck
et al., 1995), and "cloud-ionosphere electrical discharges" (Winckler,
1995). The extremely successful 1994 Sprites campaign (Lyons et al.,
1994) and the video titled "Red Sprites and Blue Jets" (Sentman
and Wescott, 1994) popularized use of the name sprite and established an
"industry standard" vocabulary that was used in publications after
that summer.
The optical and RF measurements collected
during the 1994 field campaign rapidly uncovered the basic properties of
sprites (Lyons, 1994; Lyons and Williams, 1994; Lyons et al.,
1994; Sentman et al., 1994; Sentman et al., 1995; Wescott
et al., 1994; Lyons et al., 1995a,b). Other workers (e.g., Boccippio,
1994) established the causal association of sprites with positive
cloud-to-ground lightning discharges. The articles in this special issue
describe the many advances in the understanding and measurement of the sprite
phenomena that have since taken place. The shuttle video observations served a
role as a starting point for the sophisticated observations, campaigns and
analyses that now are the norm in this field of research.
Discovery of Rocket Lightning (now known
as Blue Jets)
The initial shuttle images did not match
the duration or the description of an upward moving "rocket-like"
jet of light rising from the thunderstorm. The search for these
"rockets" continued. In 1990, Vaughan, Boeck and associates
discovered an upward propagating column within the shuttle video data that was
recorded as the shuttle was passing over Australia on October 21, 1989. This
column appeared to be an atmospheric phenomena that had been see before but
had not been captured on film or video tape (e.g., MacKenzie and Toynbee,
1886; Everett, 1903). This video of a very active storm included a
scene of jet of light rising like a rocket from the cloud anvil (Boeck et
al., 1991a,b). Copies of this video were widely distributed prior to the
publication of the discovery (Lyons, 1993). The image could not be
calibrated with the result that size and velocity measurements were not made.
The monochrome shuttle cameras provide no color or spectral information. The
next recording of this phenomenon was made in 1994. In Boeck
et al. (1995), there was sufficient data present to note that sprites are
typically associated with low flash rate cells whereas this single rocket
lightning was observed rising from a very active thunderstorm complex.
Confirmation of the Jet Phenomena
In the summer of 1994, Wescott and
associates (Wescott et al., 1994; Wescott et al., 1995a,b)
confirmed the existence of jets and named the phenomena blue jets when they
recorded a very active thunderstorm in Arkansas, USA using both a
low-light-level monochrome and a color video cameras. The video was collected
during a nighttime research flight using two aircraft that were flying around
the thunderstorm. During this flight, color video imagery established that
jets are blue in color and sprites are red. A total of 52 jets were seen
during a 20-minute time span. The jets developed over several video frames,
with a characteristic time of the order of 100 ms and propagation speeds
similar to that of a step leader process (i.e., ~ 105 m/s). The
video released after this flight proved to be a turning point in establishing
wide interest in these phenomena. The spectacular multiple close-up images of
these jets completely overshadowed the single, poorly resolved jet observation
from the space shuttle. Also discovered during this flight were examples of
blue starters (Wescott et al., 1995), an upward moving luminous
phenomenon closely related to blue jets. It is our belief that "rocket
lightning" reported by (MacKenzie and Toynbee, 1886; Everett,
1903) and (Boeck et al., 1991a,b) is the same phenomenon as "blue
jets" (Wescott et al., 1994; Wescott et al., 1995a,b).
Search for ELVES
There are no historical reports from
eyewitnesses describing the phenomenon that is now called "Emission of
Light and Very Low Frequency Perturbations From Electro-magnetic Pulse
Sources" or ELVES (Lyons and Nelson, 1995). The one millisecond
lifetime of this phenomenon explains why there have been no eyewitness
accounts describing a brief flash that would fill the entire night sky for any
observer within a 100 km radius from the causative lightning flash. Inan (1990)
and Inan et al. (1991) predicted the existence of strong Joule heating
of the base of the ionosphere by the electromagnetic pulses of natural
lightning. They, however, did not expect that the heating would be sufficient
to excite an optical emission.
Discovery of ELVES
After fifteen sprites and one jet had been
identified in the shuttle video, a distinctively different event was
discovered in shuttle video acquired on October 7, 1990 directly above an
active thunderstorm off the coast of French Guyana (Boeck et al.,
1992). A large horizontal flash appeared at the altitude of the airglow layer.
It occurred in the video field before the appearance of main lightning flash
in a thunderstorm that was near the limb of the Earth. They concluded that the
causative lightning flash occurred slightly after the video scan passed the
location of the storm image. There was a clear view of the mesosphere below
the airglow layer, but there was no indication of a sprite in the video
sequence (although a sprite event was captured 4½ hours earlier under similar
moonlight conditions). A search of the shuttle video failed to produce a
second example of this type of horizontal flash. Since it was clear that this
was not an example of a sprite or a jet, the observations were published on
the basis of this single example. The video was presented at the 1991 Spring
AGU meeting (Boeck et al., 1991a) as well as at the Aerospace Lightning
Conference (Boeck et al., 1991b). To promote a better understanding of
these new phenomena as seen from space, Vaughan distributed a number of video
tapes to various researchers who had express an interest in the phenomena.
Seminars based on the video tape
observations were given at Los Alamos National Laboratory and Stanford
University. Researchers at both of these institutions have made major
contributions to the theory of Sprite and ELVES phenomena.
Confirmation of ELVES
Several years passed before there was a
second successful measurement of the ELVES phenomenon. On June 23, 1995 Lyons
et al. (1995) and Fukunishi et al. (1996) confirmed the existence
of a flash similar to the airglow flash seen earlier in the shuttle data, and Lyons
et al. (1995) gave it the name Emissions of Light and Very Low Frequency
Perturbations From Electromagnetic Pulse Sources (ELVES). Lyons presented
video images captured by a low-light-level TV camera sited near Ft. Collins,
Colorado. The ELVES phenomenon has a characteristic event duration of one
millisecond (Fukunishi, 1996).
Conclusion
This brief partial history has outlined the
unsophisticated activities based on the video tapes obtained from the space
shuttle at the beginning of sprite research. Because these luminous phenomena
have appeared and will continue to appear for millennia, their discovery was
inevitable. This description barely touched the importance of good luck in
obtaining the early videotapes. Progress from the search, to discovery, then
to confirmation and exploration phases was achieved by a combination of
serious investigation and luck. The element of luck became less important as
the number and sophistication of the investigations increased. By that time an
"industry standard" vocabulary of descriptive terms came into use.
Video evidence for the reality of sprites
was first obtained in 1989. Although low-light-level TV cameras were produced
before then, they had not been utilized to observe distant thunderstorms. The
low-light-level monochrome TV cameras mounted on NASA's space shuttle fleet
were never designed to be scientific instruments. The camera operators did not
notice these rare and unusual events in the sky. Nevertheless, these video
tapes (both ground based and shuttle) provided the early evidence of sprite,
jet and ELVES phenomena. Analysis of the tapes by many investigators pointed
the way toward better experimental approaches and deeper understanding of
phenomena in the then very immature field. We think that the research sponsors
of Sentman and his associates as well as Lyons had very little doubt about the
reality of sprite phenomena.
The gallery of sprite, jet and ELVES images
is now filled with excellent examples obtained using sensitive instruments
mounted on high mountains or aircraft. The shuttle sprite images are now
considered small, distant images in a noisy background but they served a
purpose for a time. The high oblique view from the shuttle provided the only
unambiguous simultaneous records of a strong lightning discharge in the clouds
and the sprite in the mesosphere directly above the flash. The shuttle videos
established that lightning directly or indirectly causes sprites.
The early video observations did much to
encouraged others to take an interest in this subject area. This paper does
not attempt to review the theoretical and experimental advances that followed
the pioneering investigations. We are indebted to all who follow the trail
bringing new insight and experiences to this subject.
References
Ashmore, S. E., Unusual lightning, Weather,
5, 331, 1950.
Boccippio, D., E. Williams, W. Lyons, I.
Baker, and R. Boldi Sprites, Q-bursts, and positive ground flashes, EOS
Trans. AGU, 75, 108, 1994.
Boeck, W. L., Lightning activity in typhoon
Brenda, EOS Trans. AGU, 68, 1227, 1987.
Boeck, W. L., and O. H. Vaughan, Jr.,
Lightning observations from the STS-32 space shuttle mission , EOS Trans.
AGU, 71, 1241, 1990.
Boeck, W. L., O. H. Vaughan, Jr., and R. J.
Blakeslee, Low light level TV images of terrestrial lightning as viewed from
space, EOS Trans. AGU, 72, P21C-1, 1991a.
Boeck, W. L., O. H. Vaughan, Jr., R. J.
Blakeslee, B. Vonnegut, M. Brook and J. McKune,1991, Lightning to the upper
atmosphere: A vertical light pulse from the top of a thunderstorm as seen by a
payload bay TV camera of the space shuttle, Proc. Int. Aerospace Lightning
Conf., NASA Conference Publ. 1058, Cocoa Beach FL, 8pp., April 16-19,
1991b.
Boeck, W. L. , O. H. Vaughan, Jr., R. J.
Blakeslee, B. Vonnegut, and M. Brook, Lightning induced brightening in the
airglow layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 99, 1992.
Boeck, W. L. , O. H. Vaughan, Jr., R. J.
Blakeslee, B. Vonnegut, and M. Brook, Observations of lightning in the
statosphere, J. Geophys. Rev., 100, 1465-1475, 1995.
Everett, W. H., Rocket lightning, Nature,
68, 599, 1903.
Franz, R. C., R. J.
Nemzek, and J. R. Winckler, Television Image of a large upward electrical
discharge above a thunderstrom, Science, 249, 48-51, 1990.
Fukunishi, H., Y. Takahashi, M. Kabota, K. Sakanoi, U. S.
Inan, and W. A. Lyons, ELVES - lightning induced transient luminous events in
the lower ionosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2157-2160, 1996.
Gales, D., Another account, Weatherwise, 35
(82), 72, 1982.
Lyons, W. A., A sensor system to monitor
cloud-to-stratosphere electrical discharges, Final report, NASA contract
NAS10-1194, July 18, 1993.
Lyons, W. A., and E. R. Williams, Preliminary
investigations of the phenomenology of cloud-to-stratospheric lightning
discharges, Conf. Atmos. Elect., AMS, St. Louis, 1993.
Lyons, W. A., and E. R. Williams, Some characteristics of
cloud-to-stratosphere "lightning" and considerations for its
detection, Preprints, Fifth Symposium on Global Change Studies, AMS, Nashville
TN, Jan. 23-28, 360-367,1994.
Lyons, W. A., Characteristics of luminous structures in the
stratosphere above thunderstorms as imaged by low-light video", Geophys.
Res. Lett., 21, 875, 1994.
Lyons, W. A., I. Baker, T. E. Nelson, J. R. Winckler, R. J.
Nemzek, P. R. Malcom, E. R. Williams, D. Boccippio, The 1994 Colorado SPRITE
campaign: Initial results, EOS Trans. AGU, 75, 108, 1994.
Lyons, W. A., Low-light video observations of frequent
luminous structures in the stratosphere above thunderstorms, Monthly
Weather Review, 122, 1940, 1995.
Lyoms, W.A., T. E. Nelson, The Colorado SPRITES'95
campaign: Initial results, EOS Trans. AGU, 76, 113, 1995.
Inan, U. S., VLF heating of the lower ionosphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 17, 729-731, 1990.
Inan, U. S., T. F. Bell, and J. V. Rodrigues, Heating and
ionozation of the lower ionosphere by lightning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18,
705-708, 1991.
MacKenzie, T., and H. Toynbee, Meteorological phenomena,
Nature, 33, 246, 1886.
Malan, D. J., Sur les decharges orageuses dans la haute
atmosphere, Academie des Sciences, November 3, 1937.
Sentman, D. D., and E. M. Wescott, Video observations of
upper atmospheric optical flashes recorded from an aircraft. Geophys. Res.
Lett., 20, 2857, 1993.
Sentman, D. D., E. M. Wescott, and D. Hampton, Upper
atmospheric optical flashes observed from an aircraft, EOS Trans. AGU, 74,
156, 1993.
Sentman, D. D., and E. M. Wescott, Red sprites amd blue
jets, Geophysical Institute Video Production, University of Alaska, Fairbanks,
July, 9, 1994.
Sentman, D. D., E. M. Wescott, J. D. Williams, D. L.
Hampton, M.J. Heavner, and D. L. Osborne, ELF/VLF signatures of red sprites
and blue jets, EOS Trans. AGU, 75, 108, 1994.
Sentman, D. D., E. M. Wescott, D. L. Hampton, M. J. Heavner,
and D. L. Osborne, Preliminary results from the Sprites94 aircraft campaign:
1. Red sprites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1205, 1995.
Vaughan, Jr. O. H., and B. Vonnegut, Thunderstorm and
lightning from space shuttle, Space instrumentation for atmospheric
observations, 1979 IEEE Regional Annual Conf. Record, El Paso, TX, 98-101,
April 3-5, 1979.
Vaughan, Jr. O. H., and B. Vonnegut, Lightning to the
ionosphere?, Weatherwise, 35 (82), 70-71, 1982.
Vaughan, Jr., O.H., and B. Vonnegut, Recent Observations of
lightning discharges from the top of a thundercloud into the air above, J.
Geophys. Res., 95, 13179-13182, 1989.
Vaughan, Jr., O. H., R. J. Blakeslee, W. L. Boeck, B.
Vonnegut, M. Brook, and J. McKune, Jr., A cloud to space lightning as recorded
by the space shuttle payload bay TV cameras, Mon. Weath. Rev., 120,1459,
1992.
Vaughan, Jr., O. H., MSFC shuttle lightning research, 31th
AIAA Aerospace Sciencs Meeting and Exibit, AIAA paper no. AIAA-93-0853, Reno,
NV, Jan 10-13, 1993.
Vaughan, Jr., O. H., Observations of nocturnal
thunderstorms and lightning displays as seen during recent space shuttle
missions, AMS Severe Storms Conf., St. Louis, MO, Oct 4-8, 1993.
Vaughan, Jr., O. H., Observations of nocturnal
thunderstorms and lightning displays as seen during recent space shuttle
missions, Preprints, Fifth Symposium on Global Change Studies, AMS, Nashville
TN, Jan. 23-28, 355-359,1994.
Vaughan, Jr., O. H., Observations of nocturnal
thunderstorms and lightning displays as seen during recent space shuttle
missions, 32nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno NV, AIAA paper
AIAA-94-0480, Jan. 10-13, 1994.
Vonnegut, B., Cloud-to-stratosphere lightning, Weather,
35 (2), 59-60, 1980.
Vonnegut, B., O. H. Vaughan, Jr., and M. Brook, Photographs
of lightning from the space shuttle, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 64,150-151,
1983.
Vonnegut, B., Vertical lightning "Letters", Weatherwise,
37 (2), 61, 1984.
Vonnegut, B., O. H. Vaughan Jr., M. Brook, and P. Krehbiel,
Mesoscale observations of lightning from the space shuttle, Bull. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 66, 20-29, 1985
Wescott, E. M., D. D. Sentman, and D.L. Osborne, Video
observations of upper atmosphere discharges from an aircraft, EOS Trans.
AGU, 74, 155, 1993.
Westcott, E. M., D. D. Sentman, D. L. Hampton, M. J.
Heavner, D. L. Osborne, and J. D. Williams, Overview of the Sprites94 aircraft
campaign and results, EOS Trans. AGU, 75, 108, 1994.
Westcott, E. M., D. D. Sentman, D. Osborne, D. Hampton, and
M. Heavner, Preliminary results from the Sprites94 aircraft campaign: 2. Blue
jets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1205, 1995a.
Wescott, E. M. D. D. Sentman, M. J. Heavner, and D. L.
Hampton, Blue starters, discharges above an intense thunderstorm over
Arkansas, July 1, 1994, EOS Trans. AGU, 76, 105, 1995b.
Winckler, J. R., Further observations of cloud-ionosphere
electrical discharges above thunderstorms, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
14335, 1995.

Have fun. That is the goal of many of the offerings here at ElectricianEducation.com.
|